Universality and Promotion of Science
This section of the book is devoted first to examining some of the systems of life adopted in our world nowadays. Following the examination we should be able to decide which system best accommodates our needs for development and better life styles.
This section of the book is devoted first to examining some of the systems of life adopted in our world nowadays. Following the examination we should be able to decide which system best accommodates our needs for development and better life styles.
should also help us determine those which hinder civilization and advancement, as well as those which give no priority to the values and ethics that underpin man's social, psychological and physical well-being.
For a universal system to succeed, we need to adopt the one that is able to meet and balance our needs for a better life and prevent any transgression that may result in the destruction and extinction of mankind.
1. BUDDHISM, HINDUISM, AND SCIENCE
If we take Buddhism into consideration as a proposed universal way of life, it is easily realized that true Buddhism means complete devotion to idol worshipping and spending one's time in complete seclusion and isolation from the surrounding world, which is full of injustice.
Man, according to Buddhism, is viewed as a source of evil. In order for him to acquire righteousness, he must abandon this world and live in complete isolation. Such a philosophy can never succeed in bringing about peace of mind for its followers.
In both Hinduism and Buddhism, the world is regarded as evil, and salvation is understood as its rejection, namely, as freedom from the world. Moreover, these religions make salvation a personal, individualistic affair, since they define it in terms of states of consciousness, which can be only personal. Interaction with the outside world is viewed as evil.
Whatever social order which has been developed by the Hindus in terms of a state, an empire, a civilization or a distinctive human community was done in deviation from their teachings. Today's India based its system of government on democracy, regardless of the Hindu parties that play a major role in Indian politics.
I think that such attitudes towards life cannot be accepted in a world like ours where great advances in technology have taken place and become an integral part of our lives. No doubt, many of these advances in industry have brought many unwanted side effects in both social and health-related areas of society.
A modern atheistic civilization, to the other extreme, gives man the full liberty to involve himself in all aspects with no limits or respect to either nature or people. That can be seen in the irresponsible practices in genetic engineering and the destruction of ecology
Purely material gains have blindfolded the eyes of the developers against the devastating moral, social and health problems that are posing unprecedented threats to humankind. The materialistic solutions that seldom succeed are always sought. Aids, cancer, poverty, illiteracy, smoking, drugs, alcohol and many other social problems have grown at escalating rates. Materialistic gains have become major goals at the expense of values and morals. However, seceding at the other extreme of rejecting any involvement in the worldly affairs goes against the true nature of man. The need is urgent for a system that is not manipulated by the narrow materialist interests of a careless greedy minority; and at the same time striking a balance between man's needs for advancement in science and technology.
The need is urgent for a system that is not manipulated by the narrow materialist interests of a careless greedy minority; and at the same time striking a balance between man's needs for advancement in science and technology.
Any system of life that hinders advancement of humanity in sciences and technology that are of the benefit of humanity is not worthy of being chosen as a way of life. Islam stands tall in this regard, since it is the only religion that has opened the doors for great leaps in all fields of sciences.
Muslims do not succeed in science and technology when they distance themselves from the pure teachings of Islam. Colonialists and orientalists discovered that fact, and hence tried to distract Muslims away from the real source of development. Many historians have recognized this fact. Among them, Philip Hitti, who says while referring to AlKhawarzmi, a celebrated Muslim scholar in the field of mathematics:
One of the best scientific minds of Islam, Al-Khwarizmi, is undoubtedly the man who exercised the most influence on mathematical thought during the whole of the Middle Ages.
M. Charles, a French scientist, refers to the contribution of another Muslim mathematician, Al-Battani, by saying:
Al-Battani was the first to use in his works the expressions sine and cosine. He introduced it to geometric calculus and calls it extended shadow. It is what is called in modern trigonometry the tangent
Historians stress that modern sciences are indebted to the Muslims for great advances in many of the scientific fields. As Fauriel (1846) states: Contact between the two civilizations-- Christian and Muslim-- had been established by normal and well-founded routes.
In this, commerce and pilgrimage played the principal role. Land and sea traffic between East and West was already flourishing well before the XIth century. It was through Spain, Sicily and the South of France, which were under direct Saracen rule that Islamic civilization entered into Europe.